🔗 Share this article

A digital rights organization has stated to have harvested millions of songs from Spotify and is getting ready to publish them publicly.

Potential Boost for AI Training

Observers said the apparent data breach could aid AI companies searching for data to train their technology.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million entries of metadata such as performer and record names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million tracks, confirmed that the breach did not represent its full inventory.

“We have identified and disabled the malicious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” stated a company representative.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorized access found a external actor scraped public metadata and employed illicit tactics to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Declared Mission and Concerns

The streaming service does not believe the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

The group asserted the music files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of sharing large digital files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “preserving humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Battleground

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ copyright, said the breached music would probably be used for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on illegally sourced data is sadly widespread in the tech sector, so this accessed music is almost certain to end up instructing AI models,” he stated.

The group's website alludes to LibGen, a huge online archive of pirated books that has reportedly been leveraged by the parent company of Facebook to develop its AI models.

The co-founder of an AI startup posted on the professional network that individuals of the public could in theory “create their own personal free equivalent of the service”. The executive added it could also enable technology firms to “train on modern music at a large volume”.

Copyright has emerged as a battleground between creatives, writers and creatives on one side and tech giants on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

Across Britain, artists and writers have raised concerns against a government proposal to allow AI companies use protected work without consent unless the owner signals. Almost every respondent to a government consultation on the proposal has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for technology, innovation and development informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.